Chelation
Description: Chelation is a treatment where drugs are used to remove heavy metals from the body. There are legitimate uses for chelation, such as lead or true mercury poisoning. But, the fact is, autism is not heavy metal or mercury poisoning.
That's worth saying again: autism is not heavy metal or mercury poisoning.So, why treat autism with the wrong therapy? Well, some people speculated that autism was caused by mercury poisoning. A standard treatment for real mercury poisoning really is chelation. which is the administration of a drug that binds to metals like mercury and pulls them from the body.
The reasoning behind the mercury-poisoning theory is long, but it boils down to (a) the number of people identified with autism went up at a time when the amount of mercury in vaccines went up and (b) a paper by some non-medical people proposed that autism symptoms and mercury poisoning symptoms were similar.
The fact is, as mercury levels from vaccines have dropped, the number of people identified with autism has continued to climb. Also, if you talk to real experts in mercury toxicology, you find that there is no similarity in the symptoms. There is one medical researcher/clinician who has studied both autism and the effects of mercury, and she states unequivicobly that there is no similarity in the symptoms.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) which is a part of the National Academies of Science, convened a committee in 2004 to look at the evidence for vaccines causing autism. They came to the very strong conclusion, stronger than just there is a lack of evidence to support the idea that thimerosal (the mercury compound in vaccines) cause vaccines. They made a very strong statement that the evidence is in favor of rejecting the idea:
The committee concludes that the evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism.
They also considered the topic of chelation therapy. They stated that chelation
has potential risks and should only be performed under carefully controlled
situations:
Because chelation therapy has potentially serious risks, the committee recommends that it be used only in carefully-controlled research settings with appropriate oversight by Institutional Review Boards protecting the interests of the children who participate.
Basically they are stating, unless you are working in a research setting and
protecting the interests of the children who participate, you shouldn't be doing
chelation. These are some of the most respected physicians in their fields and
they looked at the data available. The data available now is even more strong
against the idea that mercury causes autism.
The government looked into
funding a study of chelation. First, the put it on hold, citing safety reasons.
They recently cancelled it entirely. The reason given: there is no evidence to
suggest it might work, and there
is evidence to suggest it could hurt people who don't have real heavy metal
toxicity. Here is a quote from a researcher who studies chelation:
“Our data suggest that parents of an autistic child who are considering administering chelating agents should consider not only the possibility that these drugs may not be effective, but that they may actually cause lasting adverse affects.”
Given that, why chelate?